Is it Friday already? Well, I won't take up much of your time with my third and final (I swear!) rant about preschool, but I do have another shattered nerve to piece together, and since you're here, and I'm here, let's chat, shall we?
Okay, so my first issue was about force-feeding hot dogs and grape soda to unhappy vegetarian kids who deserved a treat.
The second was about cooties and Ebola, and their relation to the Almighty Vaccine!
And now, on a much lighter note (not really), today's rant is about...
Drumrolllllllllll....
The general approach to preschool learning.
Damnit, Georgia, can a public preschool kid get their learn on? Pretty please?
I'm not saying children in Pre-K should be getting daily home work, or learning how to read chapter books using speed-reading methods. And I do get that you have to meet each child where they are and in many cases, 4 year olds haven't even mastered the alphabet, much less basic two and three letter words. To be honest though, I think that's ridiculous. Yep, I sure do! I've been around too may mothers and fathers who found the time, amidst two-job schedules and limited help from family, to teach their children the basics of reading and mathematics. Dude, toddlers are total sponges! How difficult is it to introduce them to the letters of the alphabet and basic numbers (1-10)?
Unless there's a language barrier issue, I'm unconvinced that a parent cannot find time to expose their children to those elements prior to PreK. If you feel differently, I'm definitely open to hearing some enlightening comments about it, but until then, I am where I am with it. If school in America is a public right, why doesn't it consider the actual public, instead of just creating a general approach that leaves many children bored and unchallenged with regard to academics?
One of the reasons parents send their children to preschool is so they can begin to interact with other children in a school setting. We also send them so they can begin to create positive habits where school and learning are concerned. How, pray tell, do they form these habits when the "fusion" curriculum takes a less-than-impressive approach to actually teaching our babies? Again, I'm not saying they need "heavy" stuff. Clearly, at 4 years old, coloring, free play, painting, singing, and even time on the playground, offer valuable opportunities to practice vital cognitive development skills -- I get that. I also get that what we as adults call "play time" is really prime learning time for children, as they learn how to manipulate their world, get along with each other, and see themselves outside of their parents' eyes. Check and check. Duly noted. STILL, I don't think our children are inherent dumbasses who are sure to implode should we take the chance and up the ante on what we introduce (academically) during preschool. Children are so underestimated sometimes, and it's frustrating when you know that most children aren't being held to the standard they could easily uphold, if only someone would step outside the frikkin box and give them a chance to not just meet expectations, but exceed them.
Don't you think you're children could be doing more in school?
I guess it all boils down to me and Kris shutting our big fat mouths and working more diligently to be able to afford the sorts of luxuries (e.g. hassle-free lunch bringing and occasional academic challenges) for our daughters. But until such time—and there will come such time—I'm still talking smack and no one can stop me!!
*That's my Mean-muggin' eyebrow raise* The arrows illustrate the particularly fearsome parts. #Duh


























